1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. 1) On October 19, 2015, around 18:25, 2015, the premise that the front signal of the field A located in Gunsan City is not installed at the private-distance intersection where the front signal is not installed (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”).

(i) Around 8.2m of the intersection, the Korean Peninsulad the median line in front of the other intersection and entered one lane in the opposite two-lanes of the D Two-lanes, in order to turn to the right from the intersection of the U.S. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) at the direction of the international culture village.

3) The Defendant’s vehicle was killed (hereinafter “instant accident”) when the Defendant’s vehicle was accompanied by the Plaintiff’s vehicle running across the two-lanes at the entrance of the international cultural village in the vicinity of the U.S. and the two-lanes.

(2) The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

3) On January 18, 2016, the Plaintiff calculated the amount of damages by taking into account 10% of the negligence ratio of E, and paid 360,000,000 won as damages to E. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, and Eul’s evidence No. 1 (including each number), and images.

B. The Plaintiff’s vehicle driver at the Defendant’s assertion that he had to proceed along the two-lanes of the two-lanes is negligent in proceeding one lane, or in passing through an intersection where traffic is not controlled, and thus, the Plaintiff neglected to pass through the intersection after slowly or temporarily stopping, or neglected to avoid this in spite of having discovered in advance that the Plaintiff’s vehicle was invaded by the center line, and thus, he was negligent in failing to do so. Thus, the Plaintiff acquired the Defendant’s right to compensation for damages on behalf of the Defendant E.

C. The provision that a two-wheeled motor vehicle proceeds along the two-lanes of the two-lanes.