1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the disposition are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the second instance as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment of the second instance is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 4 of the Second Ground "Agreement on the Operation of Automatic Machines" (hereinafter referred to as "the instant contract") shall be added to "the Automatic Machines, etc." and "the Automatic Machines, etc." in Part 6 shall be added to "the Automatic Machines, etc." (hereinafter referred to as "the Automatic Devices").

For the second reason, "cash withdrawal or balance inquiry, etc." in Part 7 shall be deemed to read "deposit withdrawal and balance inquiry, etc.", and the defendant in Part 8 shall be deemed to read "the defendant" as "the company outside the country."

In the last part of Part 9 for the second reason, [On the other hand, in the Additional Agreement concluded on the same day as the instant contract (hereinafter referred to as the “Additional Agreement”) and the Revised Additional Agreement concluded on November 20, 2014, a large-scale customer fee for deposit withdrawal service is separately determined within business hours and business hours, while no fee for balance inquiry service is imposed.] shall be added.

"9,890,390 won" of Part 14 and "10,087,050 won" of Part 15 shall be added, respectively, to the following:

2. The reasons why the parties' arguments and this part of the relevant laws and regulations should be explained are as follows: “The plaintiff and the non-party company provide deposit withdrawal services jointly using the automated device.” In addition, the 14th "Education Tax Act" is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance (the last day of the third to third) in addition to the fact that the 14th "Education Tax Act is applied to the former Education Tax Act." Thus, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are applied.