The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a CM car.

피고인은 2013. 12. 5. 05:00경 위 차량을 운전하여 충주시 호암동에 있는 우륵당 앞 편도 3차로 도로를 1차로를 따라 호암사거리 쪽에서 호수마을아파트 사거리 쪽으로 불상 속도로 진행하게 되었는바, 당시 야간이었고 짙은 안개로 전방 시야가 확보되지 않는 상황이었으므로, 이러한 경우 운전업무에 종사하는 사람에게는 전방 및 좌우를 잘 살피고 속도를 줄이면서 안전하게 운전하여 사고를 미리 방지하여야 할 업무상 주의의무가 있었다.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds without reducing the speed.

On the part of the vehicle's business negligence, the central separation zone installed on the right side of the above vehicle has been received and continued to be an opposite part of the vehicle's back, and the victim D (18 years of age) who was in the chief operation of the police officer suffered injury, such as the e-mail of the e-mail leaving the right side for about 14 weeks of treatment.

2. The judgment of the court below is the case falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

However, on May 13, 2014, after the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant, so this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.