The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bsch Rexton car.

On April 22, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car on April 12, 2018, and continued to drive the local highway No. 906, located at 1-3 Do Do Do Do 3, Do Do 3, Do 906, Do 3, Do 1-3, Do Do Do 3, Dong-gun, Dong-gun, Kimcheon-si, Do Do Do.

At the time, the location was unsatisfying, but it was difficult to satisfy, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear while reducing speed for those engaged in driving vehicles.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without reducing speed, the Defendant received the front section of the Da K3 Motor Vehicle, which is driven by the Defendant’s vehicle, in front of the right side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, by shocking the right side of the road, and going beyond the opposite line, from the opposite line.

After all, the Defendant suffered serious injury, such as a marcule, 11, and 12, to the victim E (V, 72 years of age) who was on the top of a passenger car operation by the said C due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and the Defendant suffered from serious injury, such as a sarcule, a sarcule,

2. The instant facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the written agreement submitted on April 16, 2019, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished for the defendant after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the