The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that A, who was known to the general public, commenced the operation of the game of this case, only has a fact that he had a guest several times, and he did not participate in the operation of the game of this case as an employee of the game of this case.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly examined and adopted in the judgment of the court below and the trial court: ① the defendant was requested to become the branch office of the game of this case where co-defendant A and D, who was known to the general public, was to be operated by two people, but refused to act as the president after hearing the words that the name of the contract of the game of this case should be in the name of the defendant; ② the defendant offered that he will bring the defendant to the game of this case 50,000 won per a day when he gets to go to the game of this case; ③ the defendant was going to go to the game of this case on several occasions (However, it seems that the defendant did not receive 50,000 won from A due to the business depression of the game of this case); ④ The defendant was also receiving a request from the investigative agency and the head of the game of this case, and the defendant was also aware that he did not directly receive the money from the game of this case and paid it to the defendant again under the condition that he did not directly receive the money from the game of this case.