The Defendants are not guilty. The Defendants are not guilty, and the summary of each of the above judgments is publicly announced.

1. On October 7, 2016, around 00:50 on the charge, Defendant A was called up with the police officer who was called up with the wind to fight between the victim G (37 years of age) and the Sin-gu E in the Fssing room located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu on October 7, 2016, and was in line with Defendant B, who was on duty with the victim B. At that place, Defendant A and the victim G were in a district without undergoing an investigation by expressing the intent not to punish each other. However, at that place, Defendant A and the victim G left the district without having to undergo an investigation, but the victim G and the victim H (46 years of age) were flickd with the human body and were flicked with the victim H (46 years of age).

At around 02:15 on the same day, the Defendants told the victims “at the left-way day, but at the south-dong and south-dong, I am hurbly at the right time,” and drive a vehicle with no personnel after driving the victim’s vehicle on a vehicle operated by Defendant B at a place where there is no personnel, and the victim’s G “I am this way without having any human resources.”

“In spite of the fact of the paragraph of this Article, the victims were sent back to the farm road without the human resources of the original Gu I even though they did not take care of the victims.”

At around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendants stated that Defendant A “I am off. I am out. I am out of the said car,” followed the victims to walk from the said car with about 2 meters depth of the body of the victim G, and continued to remove the victim H’s chest, thereby falling off as the above argument. The Defendants expressed the victim’s desire to read “I am. I am late, I am back to the victim’s hand, and I am out the victim’s hand. I am kne kel.” The Defendants expressed that “I am kel. I am this part of the victim’s kel,” and that “I am easy to complete this process.”

Nr. The Defendants called “one-time problem Da,” and the Defendants are.