beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A From November 1, 1965, from the beginning of the coal mine area in the north of Korea where the Republic of Korea Republic of Korea is located, from November 1, 1965, the Republic of Korea appointed the president of the labor union of the “F” and the representative of the “G” against the mining department of the said area. After doing so, Defendant B supplied health foods to the “Gwonland,” while engaging in the business of manufacturing coal, and Defendant B was employed as the student of the Hanwon Islands in 2012 with his aid.
Although anyone was involved in the employment of another person for profit or was unable to gain profits as an intermediary, H, the author of the above B, at the time of selecting the students of the Han River in 2012, asked B to the effect that “the success of his children was caused by the aid of the above A and B,” “the success of his children in the above A and B, with the help of the above A and B, shall be changed to the end of the Han River,” and B shall be willing to ask B, with the help of the above I to be employed in the Han River.
1. On January 2014, Defendant A received the said I’s personal information from the above B, and received a request from the said B to get employed as a Gangseodo Dr. In return for such solicitation, Defendant A received the Defendant’s remittance of KRW 1 million from around the 30th of the same month to January 22, 2015, and received a total of KRW 10 million from the above day to January 22, 2015.
Accordingly, the defendant was involved in the employment of others for profit or obtained benefits as an intermediary.
2. On January 19, 2014, Defendant B: (a) requested that I be employed in the Gangwon-do Government; and (b) requested that I be employed in the Gangwon-do Government; and (c) received personal information, etc. on the I as stated in the preceding paragraph; and (d) received KRW 20 million from the above H around December 19, 201.
Accordingly, the defendant is different from for-profit.