The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant is a person who uses a DNA “C” or an undisclosed “D” at the Internet website.

No person shall defame any third person by disclosing false information openly through an information and communications network, with intent to defame any third person.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant, at the residence of Songpa-gu Seoul E building D, 507, set up a Blob, “F,” and then seeks to hear the voice of Gosibs in G.

Under the title "", 5 minutes of counseling and consultation with the chief of counseling office who is responsible for avoiding and managing interest responsibilities rather than solving problems in the event of occurrence of problems, and who is responsible only for giving rise to the quality of time to the next management, and 5 minutes of counseling and consultation with him/her.

Notice of “H” and “H” are connected to the car page of “H,” and “H” and “H may not be absolutely refunded even if there was a demand for refund only with low conditions without any desired treatment relationship.”

As funeral services are known, public relations but this bad morals clinic is the place where the consumers, who have given distinct and distinct strings, should be avoided.

The volume in the Dong 】 the capacity of the doctor who seems to be outside the area 】 the capacity, and the effect is too unnecessary;

The phrase “informed publicly false information through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim I, who is the president and the president.”

2. The assertion and judgment

A. While recognizing the fact that the Defendant posted the same article as that stated in the facts charged, the Defendant’s assertion that: (i) the Defendant did not have any false fact or false fact; and (ii) the Defendant’s notice did not constitute a false fact; and (iii) the Defendant’s assertion that there was no purpose of slandering the Defendant’

The argument is asserted.

B. (1) Determination 1) “Purpose of slandering a person” under Article 70 of the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. of Information and Communications Network Act is required, and the content and nature of the relevant timely fact is the purpose of slandering a person.