logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.12.18 2018고합84
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2018, the Defendant was elected at the 7th simultaneous local election C, a candidate for a political party of Do Council members D, all over the country, which was implemented by the Defendant.

No person shall visit door to door for an election campaign.

Nevertheless, at around 11:30 on June 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) worn the Fow for an election campaign in which the Defendant’s political party and marks, and names are indicated; (b) opened the first floor safety department, social welfare department, accounting department, the second floor general affairs department, planning and audit office, cultural campaign bulletin office, the third floor regional economy department, fishery department, road traffic department, fourth floor forest department, urban department, construction department, and separate community information department; and (c) visited public officials in order to conduct personnel affairs or to receive music information at the place; and (d) distributed the name of candidate to some public officials.

The Defendant, at around 14:00 on the same day, visited public officials in the C Agricultural Technology Center in order to wear an occupant for election campaign, wear an concentration, eco-friendly technology department, agricultural support department, and warden, and distributed the name of the candidate. On the same day, at C Public Health Center located in H around 16:30, the Defendant carried out an election campaign gate and carried out personnel management and distributed the name of the candidate by visiting public officials in order to improve health, promote health, promote health, and visit public health projects and the warden, and distribute the name of the candidate.

In this respect, the defendant tried to protect the defendant by door for election campaign.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, and K;

1. A report on internal investigation (the statement on the phone of the staff of the C Viewing Center), internal investigation report (the phone of the visit of the Ministry of Agriculture Technology Center, the Public Health Center), internal investigation report (the phone of the head of the public health clinic for verification of the visit), report on internal investigation (Attachment of photographs, such as C Viewing), internal investigation report (Attachment of a statement of a public official present at the time of visit), internal investigation report (Attachment of a statement of a public official present at the time of visit); report on internal investigation (Attachment of a ledger for the use

1. A name copy of the respondent, CCTV-cap photographs, on-site photographs, nine pages of a written statement, a list of candidates, and C Council members;

arrow