logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2006. 1. 27. 선고 2005노2765 판결
[특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)·유해화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)·도로교통법위반(무면허운전)][미간행]
Escopics

Defendant

Appellant. An appellant

Defendant

Prosecutor

Dried iron metal

Defense Counsel

Attorney Kim Jong-hwan (Korean)

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon District Court Decision 2005Ma2901 Delivered on December 8, 2005

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

45 days from the number of days under confinement prior to the pronouncement of this judgment shall be included in the penalty of the original judgment.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

In light of the fact that the defendant's depth is against, the sentence of imprisonment (one year and six months of imprisonment and fine of 300,000 won) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

In addition, the defendant repeated the same criminal acts during the period of repeated crimes, and the statutory penalty for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes is "a life imprisonment or a limited term of not less than three years" and even if mitigated, the sentence imposed by the court below should be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than one year and six months, and considering the contents and circumstances of the crime in this case, including the minimum punishment, the circumstances before and after the crime, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character, behavior and environment, even if considering the circumstances claimed by the defendant, the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and therefore

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and 45 days out of the number of days under confinement prior to the pronouncement of this judgment shall be included in the punishment of the original judgment, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Dok-man (Presiding Judge) Full-time correspondence

arrow