A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant knew with B, known to the public, thought that C and the victim D (37 years of age) who is a de facto spouse of the Defendant were disturbed, were able to give the victim a divorce.

On June 5, 2015, in front of the new shotjin-ro 807, the defendant and B, around 02:0 on June 5, 2015, had a dispute with the victim in front of the new shotjin-ro 807, Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, and brought the victim's shoulder with his hand, leading the victim's shoulder, carrying the victim and the victim's resistance on his spoke-ro, leaving the back to his spoke-ro, leaving the victim's spoke-ro, leaving the victim's resistance into his spoke-ro, and detained about 15 minutes by suppressing the resistance, and going to the defendant's house in Seo-gu, Daejeon

At around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendant, in the house of the Defendant, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon E 303, had a victim seated in his/her dwelling room, walking the victim's face, etc., and the Defendant collected knife the knife (15cm in blade length) and unloaded the part of the victim's knife with the knife, etc.

As a result, Defendant 2 and B jointly detained the victim, carried with dangerous objects, and carried the victim several times, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as cage cages, dufs, and dufs open cages, which require approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the police interrogation protocol Nos. 2 and 3 as to B in part;

1. Each statement made by the police in relation to F, D, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in a written injury diagnosis;

1. Article 258-2 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 2 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint confinement

1. Of concurrent offenders, many of the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, poorness of the reasons for sentencing, attitude of investigative agencies, and the same penal power.