A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On January 27, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. and was released on August 14, 2006 during the execution of the sentence, and the parole period expired around that time.

[2015 Highest 4749] The Defendant, on November 22, 2013, 2013, carried the victim B by using a “com” francul, a smartphone around 2013, where he was in a fluorial relationship with the victim B, she walked a telephone to the victim at around 10,00, around 22, 2013, while leaving the phone to the victim, and there is no money in the present. The Defendant would immediately pay off the money if he was sold.

“A false statement” was made.

However, there was no reason that the Defendant did not have sold the land in an up-to-date city, and at the time, the Defendant’s certificate of authorized broker was revoked, and the Defendant’s certificate of qualification was worked as a real estate broker, and even if the studio sales and rental performance were not good and income was low to borrow money from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to pay the money properly.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 1.7 million won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the Defendant on the same day under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 3,910,000,000 from November 8, 2013 to August 23, 2014, respectively, for a total of 59 times, such as the list of crimes (1) as shown in the attached Table.

[2015 Highest 6051] The Defendant deposited KRW 20 million in the passbook in the south-gu C at around October 24, 2014, and seized to the victim E.

There is no money by losing the card to pay taxes, so that the card is lost, it will be repaid one week after lending 10 million won.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the facts are that the Defendant did not deposit KRW 20 million in the head of the Tong, and the Defendant bears a loan obligation of KRW 5 million to the lending company without any apparent revenue or property, and even if the Defendant borrows money from the damaged party due to the default of KRW 5 million in the medical insurance premium.