logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단479
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 12, 2013, the defrauded concluded on May 12, 2013, that “The Defendant would sell or sell the land to the victim B at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Chungcheongnam-gu Ho-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and would sell the land to the victim B within three months if he/she lent KRW 20 million to him/her.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not own the above real estate and did not have any intent or ability to repay it within the above period even if he borrowed money from the injured party.

On May 14, 2013, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 20 million to the victims through the SC bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the defendant.

2. On July 10, 2013, the Defendant, on July 10, 2013, posted a phone call to the victim B at an irregular place, thereby falsely concluding that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 500,000,000,00,000,000,000 to be repaid three days after the date of the activity.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the money within the above period.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 500,000 won through the account as stated in Paragraph 1 of the same day from the victim.

3. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant was subject to seizure by a phone call from the victim B at an irregular place on October 2, 2013.

Since money in the head of the Tong cannot be integrated, it was called that the money in the head of the Tong would not be seized within 100,000 won, and the money in the head of the Tong would be repaid within 10,000 won.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the money within the above period.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 3 million through the account as described in paragraph 1 of the same day by the victim.

4. On January 2, 2014, the Defendant committed fraud on January 2, 201, at an inorganic place.

arrow