A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 6, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the first intersection of the North Korean Peninsula on June 26, 2017.

"2018 Highest 433"

1. Criminal facts committed on April 27, 2018;

A. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) had no intent or ability to pay the price of the goods at the victim C’s convenience store located in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun; (b) had by deceiving the victim as if he would purchase the goods normally; and (c) had the victim received delivery of 1 A of DNA tobacco equivalent to KRW 4,100 at the market price from the victim.

B. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was receiving a hacker and chroding service from “G” beauty room of the victim F’s “G” operated by Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun; (b) on April 27, 2018, the Defendant stolen one cell phone (LGM-X320K) holding one victim’s cell phone ownership (LGM-X320K) whose market value had been placed on the string of the other customer’s head at the divers by the victim was hidden.

(c)

The fraud accused, even though there is no intention or ability to pay service costs at the date, time, and place mentioned in the above B, deceiving the Defendant as if he would normally pay the work cost, and it was provided with the hedge and chroding service equivalent to the market price of 40,000 won from the injured party, and acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount.

2. Criminal facts committed on April 28, 2018.

A. On April 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the Defendant: (b) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant: (c) on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, at the first convenience store located in the K-si H apartment apartment located in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do; and (d) on the part of the Defendant: (a) instead of having no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee normally, the Defendant deceptiond the Defendant by: (b) holding the Defendant liable for payment of the taxi fee on the part of the Defendant, stating that “A City Da up

The defendant is provided with taxi operation service from the injured party as above and is in the Hongcheon-gun L, the destination of which is the defendant.