logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고단1355
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 22:00 on December 13, 2017, the Defendant issued an order for food to the E cafeteria where the victim D with the first floor of the Jung-gu Seoul Central District Office(Seoul Central District Court Decision 1355, Dec. 13, 2017) works at the luxer, and the fact is false as if he would normally pay the food value despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the food value, and acquired it by being provided with food equivalent to 29,700 won at the market price from the damaged person.

"2018 Highest 1676"

1. On June 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00 on June 11, 2017, the Defendant: (b) was a victim G (48 tax) in the vicinity of the F Hotel in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (c) was able to make a false representation as if he would normally pay taxi usage fees although he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay taxi usage fees; and (d) by using a taxi, he/she was provided with taxi services of 73,360 won from the damaged person; and (c) acquired the amount equivalent to the said amount by taking advantage of the taxi.

2. On January 19, 2018, the Defendant, at around 18:00 on January 19, 2018, obtained orders from the victim J (333) located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I 3rd floor with food value as if he would normally pay the food value despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the food value. The Defendant issued orders for food with water leakage and received food equivalent to 29,700 won at the market price from the damaged person and acquired it by taking the food with food equivalent to 29,70 won at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A written statement of the victim D;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of J and G;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.

arrow