beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from May 1, 2019 to July 17, 2019 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed a marriage report with C on September 25, 2012, and has two children who are currently living in 2014 and 2018.
B. From August 2018, the Defendant, even though he was pregnant by the Plaintiff, was aware that C was a spouse of C, commenced an unlawful act, such as engaging in the conduct between C and C.
C. On August 18, 2018, the Plaintiff became aware of the Defendant and C’s misconduct, and was ordered by C to adjust the relationship with the Defendant.
However, the defendant and C's misconduct continued even after they were committed.
At around October 4, 2018, the mother of C, who became aware of the Defendant and C’s wrongful act, demanded the Defendant to terminate the Defendant’s wrongful act with C, and said C to the effect that he would settle the Defendant’s wrongful act.
However, the misconduct between the defendant and C has not been terminated.
E. On November 11, 2018, the Plaintiff gave birth to the second child, and later became a postnatal care center, and C was raising the first child at the home where the Plaintiff resides together with the childbirth leave.
On November 18, 2018, the Plaintiff went to the said house, and came to the said house on November 19, 2018, and discovered the Defendant who was hiding in Vietnam.
F. On November 22, 2018, the Plaintiff filed the instant complaint with the Defendant claiming damages against unlawful acts.
G. C calls for the Plaintiff to “the divorce to be newly withdrawn with the Defendant” after leaving a house at the beginning of 2019, and then demanding that the Plaintiff “the Plaintiff be divorced with the Defendant,” and the Defendant continues to commit the aforementioned unlawful act with C.
H. The Plaintiff currently raises the first and second, which is not yet a stone, who is a spouse and a father of son, in law.
[Reasons for Recognition] The assertion of confession, the fact that it is obvious to this court
2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant can be recognized as having committed a fraudulent act with C, the plaintiff's spouse, and the defendant's improper act is the plaintiff.