1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as annual 5% from August 31, 2019 to May 14, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a legal couple married with C on November 12, 2009, and has one child between C and C.

B. The Defendant and C began to have personal remainder since early 2017, and committed unlawful acts by having sexual intercourses several times from around that time to November 2018.

Although the Defendant asserts that the unlawful act with C was terminated on May 2017, according to the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 5, 7 through 12, 20 through 26 (including virtual numbers), the Defendant and Eul repeated several times from early 2017 to November 2018, and sent several messages to ordinary people in the process of sending a series of messages to each other. During that period, the Defendant and C met with their two-day travels or agreed to provide a hotel, and the Defendant and the Defendant’s children met with each other. Accordingly, according to the above acknowledged facts, it is sufficient to deem that the above act by the Defendant and C committed an unlawful act committed against the husband’s duty of good faith. Thus, the above argument by the Defendant is without merit.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 26 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

(a) A third party shall not interfere with a married couple's community life falling under the essence of marriage, such as interfering with a couple's community life by causing a failure of a married couple's community;

In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with either side of the married couple and causing mental pain to the spouse by infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997, Nov. 20, 2014). B.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is aware that C is a spouse.