1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 471,324,79, KRW 124,99, KRW 124,99, KRW 99, and each of the said money to Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F, respectively.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff A, who was charged with the summary detention of the case, constituted an anti-government organization called the "G General Association" (hereinafter referred to as the "G"), and tried to induce a large-scale riot upon being driven by the hinterland of the past H Party (hereinafter referred to as the "H Party"), which is an underground organization for public secrets and underground, and after being driven by the front of Japan.The plaintiff A was indicted for violating the Presidential Emergency Decree such as the violation of the National Security Act (paragraphs 1 and 4), the National Security Act violation, and the charge of preparation for insurrection.

On July 13, 1974, the Council of the Emergency and General Law for the plaintiff A's release was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 15 years and suspension of qualifications for 15 years, recognizing the whole facts charged against the plaintiff A as guilty.

(74. On September 7, 1974, the first instance court conference dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal against the instant judgment subject to a retrial (hereinafter “instant judgment subject to a retrial”). The Plaintiff appealed against the instant judgment subject to a retrial, but the first instance court conference dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on September 7, 1974.

(74. The Plaintiff’s appeal was filed by the High Military Branch No. 14, 15, and 16). On October 25, 1974, the instant judgment subject to a retrial became final and conclusive as it was by withdrawal of the final appeal.

Plaintiff

A was released on February 16, 1975 by suspending the execution of a sentence, which was finalized in the instant judgment subject to a retrial.

(3) From April 18, 1974 to February 16, 1975, the Development Committee, which decided to conduct an investigation to ascertain the truth of the H Party and G cases through the Finding the truth of the past incidents under the control of the National Intelligence Service (hereinafter referred to as the “Accompony”) to conduct an investigation to ascertain the truth of the past cases under the control of the National Intelligence Service, shall review various records, such as investigation and trial records related to the instant judgment subject to a retrial, and interview and investigate the persons involved in the instant case and employees of the State agencies at the time of the instant case, and expressed the following opinions around December 7, 2005:

In other words, G case is arrested without a warrant by distorted pure anti-government demonstration directly by the President into H City/Do under which the public-private partnership will be able to render assistance to the public-private partnership.