beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 24, 2014, around 14:20, the Defendant appeared as a witness of an perjury case against Defendant C at the Busan District Court No. 351, which was located in the Busan District Court, at the Busan District Court, around 31, 2014.
The above case was prosecuted for perjury by making a false statement to the effect that “D was present as a witness and stated that D lent KRW 3 million to the Defendant with an agreement,” in the case of the Defendant’s fraudulent case prosecuted for having received KRW 3 million from D under the name of lease deposit, even though the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to lease the tree house, and was prosecuted for perjury. In fact, the Defendant did not have any fact of borrowing KRW 3 million from D.
Nevertheless, the Defendant testified that “D, rather than lending KRW 3 million to a witness, it would correspond to the advance payment for the lease” of the defense counsel, “I think that D would have borrowed the witness instead of the advance payment for the lease. D is also a member of the board of directors for the witness by directly talking that D would have been a member of the board of directors for the witness. Since 2000, since 200, it would be 30 times in the surrounding areas, and it would be leased because it was known that the number of celebs and neighboring residents knew that there is a dispute between the witness’s relatives, and there was no time to lease.”
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Protocol of examination of witnesses (part of protocol of the fourth trial), Decision 2013 High Court Decision 4609, Decision 2014No1310, Decision 2014No1310, Decision 2014Do9590, Decision 2012 High Court Decision 977, Decision 2012No3562, 3860 (Joint Decision), Court Decision 2012No3562, 3860 (Joint Decision), Court Decision 2013Do7343, and application of statutes in each protocol of examination of witnesses (part of protocol of the third trial)
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;