logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.10.07 2014고단7808
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around May 30, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “Around May 30, 2012, the Defendant would have paid 458,410 won each month in installments every 36 months of the next 36 months, so that the Defendant would be able to purchase a vehicle using the capital of the capital of the victim,” at C, a middle and high vehicle dealer located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the installment even if the automobile was purchased by installment.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, committed an automobile installment contract purchased at the end of 11.7 million won in the principal of the victim Aju Capital, DMW, and 1.7 million won in the part of DMW, and at the end of 36 months in the installment period, caused Aju Capital to pay the purchase price of the said vehicle by subrogation, and did not pay the purchase price of the said vehicle by subrogation, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the same amount from the victim.

"2015 Highest 1433"

1. Fraudulent crimes against victims E;

A. A. Around September 12, 2012, the F-related Defendant called “F-related Defendant: (a) from G, a LGpller agent located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the victim E (the age of 31) phone calls to the victim E (the age of 31); and (b) “If the mobile phone is broken down or its cell phone is lent, it shall be used only for three months, and the fee shall not be paid to the victim E

However, there is no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone price or the user fee even if the mobile phone is opened and used in the victim's name because there is an economic difficulty such as the unpaid user fee of the existing mobile phone at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a copy of the same person’s driver’s license from the victim, and used it to use it in the victim’s name, and used it from that City to July 2013, and then unpaid KRW 1,246,760 in total of the mobile phone prices and the user’s license fees, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

(b) H-related.

arrow