logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단643
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant against the Victim B: (a) reported the advertisement attached by the Defendant in a single unit in Gwangju City as “free, overdue, delinquent, delinquent, and low-credit cash payment”; (b) made the victim B as if he/she were to pay the mobile phone use fee; and (c) extended the victim KRW 50,000 per 1 unit to the victim.

The interest of one month is 2,000 won.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the fact that the victim opened a new mobile phone in the name of the victim and distributed the mobile phone with the inner phone name, was only a plan to have the victim bear the total amount of installment payments and user fees of the above mobile phone, but it was not true that the victim did not notify the victim of such fact.

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) caused the victim to enter into an installment contract against the two mobile phones in the name of the victim from the victim at that place; (c) received the aforementioned mobile phone from the victim; and (d) did not pay the amount equivalent to KRW 1,261,110; and (c) acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. On February 29, 2016, the Defendant, against the victim D, extended a loan of KRW 500,000 to the victim D who reported and found the above advertisement at the above location.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the fact that the victim opened a new mobile phone in the name of the victim and distributed the mobile phone with the inner phone name, was only a plan to have the victim bear the total amount of installment payments and user fees of the above mobile phone, but it was not true that the victim did not notify the victim of such fact.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, caused the victim to enter into an installment contract against the cell phone in the name of the victim between SKT and the victim, and caused the victim to do so.

arrow