Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a woman living together with C who was tried for a case, such as violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, etc., of Gwangju District Court 2013 Man-Ma352.

On August 22, 2013, at around 19:30 on August 2, 2013, the Defendant stated to the effect that “E” in the Gwangju Mine District, referred to the effect that “E” means to the effect that “At the time of sexual traffic, the Defendant asked the said F to testify that there is no fact of intimidation from C,” thereby threatening “E” to discontinue sexual traffic with others.

9. From May 17, 2017, upon request as above, F made several times by talking with F or communicating with F, and in fact, F attempted to keep sexual traffic from around November 2012 to around February 2013 while engaging in sexual traffic. Although F did not discontinue sexual traffic on the wind that is threatened by C and did not discontinue sexual traffic until May 2013, F had F give false testimony that there was no fact of engaging in sexual traffic by intimidation from C.

At around 10:30 on September 23, 2013, the Defendant instigated perjury by having F give false testimony contrary to his memory from the Gwangju District Court 201, which is located in Gwangju Dong-dong, Gwangju Metropolitan City, to the said purport.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the examination record by the F witness;

1. A copy of the F1, 2, and 3-time statement prepared by the police officer;

1. Submission of additional evidential data (126 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Attachment of judgment No. 2013 high-class352 of the Gwangju District Court Act), and to a criminal investigation report (preparation of a record);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 152 (1) and 31 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Statutory mitigation under Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant is attempting to commit the crime from the investigative agency and reflects it, and the crime of this case is committed before the case of perjury is finalized.