logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.06.12 2019고정401
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

The Defendant was guilty of the crime (the facts charged in the preliminary charge) and the Defendant heard her fluencing her friend that the victim B (here, 31 years of age) who was divorced at the kindergarten of his child was unable to have her fluencing a disturbance by finding the kindergarten of his child. On March 10, 2018, the Defendant followed the victim’s cell phone at around 10:53, 2018, the victim’s cell phone at around 10:53, “C was aware of the flucing adaptation period and found the fluencing, but the flucing year was sent to the flucing market so that the flucings can well look at C, and the flucing year was sent to the flucing market so that the flucings can easily look at C, even after being flucing, the victim’s text message could not be moved from D.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (Attachment of text messages to the victim sent by a suspect);

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day converted);

1. The portion not guilty under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (the grounds why the defendant sent text messages to the victim, and the relationship between the defendant and the victim);

1. The summary of the facts charged (main facts charged) and the victim B (the age of 31) are between the Defendant and the victim (the age of 31) around April 2017.

No one shall repeatedly reach another person with any code, text, sound, image, or picture that arouses uneasiness or fear through an information and communications network.

Nevertheless, around 10:53 on March 10, 2018, the Defendant used for the E mobile phone using the victim, found the F mobile phone "C" to be a subjectal adaptation period, and found it difficult for the Defendant to look back with C, but the record or the result of the crypted book on the mother and child plate so that the students can well look at C.

arrow