1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months in Seoul Southern District Court for the crime of interference with business, which became final and conclusive on April 25, 2015.

around 13:30 on March 13, 2014, the Defendant, “2015 high-level 114,” was an employee who manages the place within the Cinin in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and was a victim D (the age of 44) with 1 kin, No. 1 kin, No. 1 kin, kin and beer, etc. ordered to do so, and continued to do so.

However, the Defendant: (a) took the food on the floor that the victim did not take a crypt; and (b) took a bath on the floor; and (c) obstructed the victim’s work by force by force, such as having the customers who had crypt the crypted the cryp at a certain place in order to let the crypt the crypt; and (b) having the customers who had crypt the crypted.

From 00:15 to 00:40 on February 28, 2014, the Defendant, “2015 Go-Ma136”, the Defendant: (a) laid the breath of the breath of the G department operated by the Victim F (53 years of age) in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon; (b) laid the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the G department operated by the Victim F (53 years of age); (c) laid the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the boom;

Summary of Evidence

1. Division: Copy of the judgment and results of case search “2015, 114”;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The written statement of D "2015, 136";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.