The part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the compensation order, and the judgment of the court of second instance shall be reversed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence imposed by the court below on the Defendants [the defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of one year and six months, for a short of one year (the first instance judgment), and for a long of four months, for a short of two months (the second instance judgment), for a short of one year and six months, for a short of one year and six months, and for a short of one year) is too unreasonable

2. Determination

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal by Defendant A, the court below examined the above Defendant A ex officio, and sentenced the above Defendant A to ① High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 239, High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 202 High Court Decision 201Hun-Ga638 Decision 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 201Hun-Ga764 decided April 2012, and 2012 High Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 201Da13720 decided April 31, 2017.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by Defendant B’s record, namely, Defendant B, at the Daegu District Court’s Family Branch on February 9, 201, committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that Defendant B received juvenile protective disposition (disposition No. 9) and had been detained in the juvenile reformatory, and without being aware of the record of being detained in the juvenile reformatory. In the case of the instant fraud crime, the amount obtained by deceit is up to KRW 17,072,00 (except for the part of the sole crime committed by Defendant A). The said Defendant appears to have first been proposing to take part in the instant fraud crime against Defendant A, and the instant fraud appears to have been proposed.