logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2017.02.09 2016고합48
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Gohap 48"

1. On December 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on December 10, 2016, at around 20:15, 2016, sought a victim by requesting the Defendant to reach an agreement on the instant case, such as the crime of destroying special property (hereinafter “the crime of destroying property”) against the Defendant pending in the trial in Maart operated by the Gangwon-do Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, as well as around 66 years old; (b) but (c) on the ground that the Defendant did not comply with the request, the Defendant would not keep the victim only.

Madden death.

I would like to threaten the victim while referring to “the same year as bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of Stock.

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim for the purpose of agreement to revoke the complaint in relation to his criminal case judgment.

2. On December 11, 2016, the Defendant of the crime committed around December 11, 2016, on the grounds that the victim did not reach an agreement on the case, such as the crime of destroying the above special property against the Defendant, at the places indicated in the preceding paragraph, at around 10:20 on December 11, 2016, as well as that the victim reported to the police and sent to the police in relation to the crime described in the preceding paragraph, and went to the F District of the Seocho Police Station of the Republic of Korea.

C. Republic of Korea goes against the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation. The four years in the Republic of Korea goes against the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation.

He shall be dead and retaliationed.

“Intimidating the victim”, the victim threatened the victim.

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim for the purpose of the agreement on the cancellation of the complaint in relation to the retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation such as a complaint and his criminal case judgment.

" 2016 Gohap 49"

1. On August 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) destroyed special property damage and a special assault: (b) caused the victim D (n, 65 years of age) located in Yangyang-gun C on the front of the “EM” operated by the victim D (n, the husband of the victim; and (c) caused a dangerous object that he was in possession of for the reason that he was under the influence of alcohol by reporting G, who is the husband of the victim; and (d) destroyed the damage by 90cc in length to 2 the market price of the victim’s possession; and (e) the Defendant was rash.

arrow