logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.26 2013고단1207
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On July 26, 1993, at around 17:22, the Defendant was the owner of a truck A, and around July 26, 1993, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by carrying a cargo of 11.3 tons on the third axiss exceeding 10 tons of a stable weight at the front of the petition office of the Korea Highway Corporation, and operating the said vehicle.

2. In applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), the judgment prosecutor filed a public prosecution by applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Dec. 22, 1993), and the sentence of a fine of KRW 300,00 was finalized by a summary order of December 22, 1993, but Article 86 of the same Act provides that "if an agent, employee or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under Article 84 shall also be retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court Order of Dec. 29, 2011.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow