logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.26 2013고단1159
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On September 11, 1993, at around 02:05, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by loading more than 2.4 tons and more than 2 tons of freight on the 2nd nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of

2. In applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), the judgment prosecutor filed a public prosecution by applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Dec. 18, 1993), and the sentence of a fine of KRW 200,000 was finalized by a summary order of December 18, 1993, but Article 86 of the same Act provides that "if an agent, employee or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under Article 201Hun-Ga24 of Dec. 29, 201 shall be retroactively invalidated.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow