A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 7, 2017, around 22:30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant was drunk in relation to the bullying by the victim C (the son, 50-year old-old) who was suffering from the wound of the victim (the son, the son, the son, the son, at around 205-dong 104-dong 204-dong 204-dong 104-dong 104; and (b) the Defendant was under the influence of the b

“The head, chest, and arms part of the victim are cut back several times due to drinking, and again, the part of the victim’s chest was walked several times, and the beer can which was in a cooling place, and the head of the victim was turned back several times due to the beer cans which were in the cooling place, and approximately two weeks of the head of the beer was placed on the head of the damaged person.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

2. On January 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report at the place specified in paragraph (1) around 00:47, and took part in the police box E, who was a public official of the police officer affiliated with the police station of the Gyeongnam Police Station; (b) sought a statement of damage from the police box E, who was a public official of the police officer affiliated with the Gyeongbukbuk Police Station; and (c) received a request from the above D police box to leave the police box; (d) received a request to request the Defendant to leave the police box; (e) the Defendant arrived at the above place; (e) but, upon receiving the consent of the above C, the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant to report the new outbreak in the said house, and (e) took a bath to the said F, “I am under the influence of the Defendant, upon the report on the new outbreak of feat; and (e) was subject to a warning to interfere with the execution of public duties by the said F, thereby taking the Defendant’s chest by hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties in the criminal investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F or C by the police;

1. On-site photographs and standing photographs;

1. Investigation report (the form at the time of investigation into the counter phone of the G laundry site and detection of the victim C);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.