A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The injured Defendant is a person in a de facto marital relationship with the injured party B (n, 63 years of age).

A. On September 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) divided the Defendant’s injury on September 15, 2016, from around 19:00 to around 19:00 on September 15, 2016, at the Defendant’s home located in the 3rd floor of Gyeongnam-gun, Sinnam-gun, and the Defendant’s injury

Although the victim made a speech, it was possible to cut off the breast part of the victim's body in several times because the victim took money to the defendant, the victim was pushed down, and the victim was flicked, and the victim was flicked with the face and head part of the drinking, and the victim was flicked with a flick and flick part of the flick wall in the number of days of treatment.

B. On October 11, 2017, the Defendant injured the victim on the following occasions: (a) around 02:42 on October 11, 2017, the Defendant: (b) around 02:42, and (c) around 32, 2017: (a) around the 11st century, the Defendant: (a) kiddddd the victim’s spons the spher on the floor; (b) kidd the victim’s sphere; (c) kid the head of the sphere; (d) kid the victim’s face and the sphere part of the sphere; and (e) flad the victim’s sphere, the victim was sphered to undergo approximately 2-

2. On October 11, 2017, around 02:55, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at around 02:55, and reported the assault at the places indicated in paragraph 1-b, and committed an assault by the Defendant at the E box F, Inspector G, who was dispatched to the scene, and the Defendant’s son, saying, “The police son was humed and humed only at her female horses, and this son is hume and hums are dumped.” The Defendant dumped the Defendant on the hand floor of the F one time by sumping the chest’s left side with a single humf and two hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation and prevention of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to B or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the response materials commissioned for appraisal;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor for each crime.