Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud (2016dan1928) around 07:50 on July 31, 2016, the Defendant, at the E-mail store operated by Cheongju-gu E-Sung-gu E-mail around 07:50 on July 31, 2016,: (a) the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay the price of the goods, led an employee F to pay the price of the goods; (b) by deceiving F by means of making a false statement “F to be kept friendly,” so that F would not control the Defendant; and (c) by deceiving F with a sum of KRW 360,00,00, such as a 1 cans, 1 disease, 1 disease, etc., of the So-called So-called So-called So-young-gu, Cheongju-gu.

2. Dec. 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on September 20, 2016, on the roads of the Hyundai Department Store in front of the 308 Cheongju-si, Chungcheongnam-si; and (b) on September 20, 2016, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay the taxi expenses, expressed the view that the victim would be paid the taxi expenses; (c) by deceiving the victim by the method of boarding the said taxi; and (d) had the victim operate the said taxi from about 3 km to the roads before J in the same Gu I, the Defendant did not pay KRW 5,200 to the said taxi; and (e) did not pay KRW 5,200 to the said owner of the said taxi.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1 in the market (2016 Highest 1928)]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A receipt [the fact referred to in Article 2 at the time of market sale (the fact referred to in Article 2253 at the time of market sale];

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a taxi charge receipt;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not only that the defendant has been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, but also that the defendant has a criminal record of imprisonment with prison labor resulting therefrom, but is during the period of repeated crime.