beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
Section 1. Paragraph 1. of the attached Table between the co-defendant B and the defendant in the first instance.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the Defendant added a judgment on the argument that a fraudulent act was established under paragraph (2) at the appellate court; and (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where (c) the Defendant added 10, 12, and less than 12, out
2. Additional determination as to the establishment of a fraudulent act
A. 1) The Defendant’s assertion as to whether each of the instant sales contracts exceeds B’s obligation is a fraudulent act. As such, the Defendant asserted that B did not have any obligation at the time of the sales contract, the Plaintiff’s claim for revocation of the Plaintiff’s fraudulent act was not satisfied. Therefore, this paper examines whether B’s claim for revocation of the Plaintiff’s fraudulent act could be deemed to have been in excess of the obligation at the time of each of the instant sales contract. 2) In full view of the following: (a) evidence Nos. 1, 1, 4, 6, 9 (including the serial number, hereinafter the same), 1, 4, 6, 9, and 1, 2, 2, and 31, 200, 200, and 2,645,000,000 won at the time of the instant first sales contract and the fact-finding inquiry reply
① The E Bank Loan Obligations: 100,000,000 won (2) Loan Obligations: 250,000,000 won (3) Loan Obligations of the G Union: KRW 1,465,00,000 (after this, KRW 80,000,000 on December 5, 2016; KRW 1,35,000,000 on December 13, 2016; KRW 1,35,000,000 on the repayment; and KRW 1,35,00,00,000 on the repayment of KRW 3 Real Estate). (4) Comprehensively taking account of the purpose of Article 2 through 5,88,00,000,000 as Loan Obligations of the F Union Loan Obligations, the Plaintiff’s obligation to return lease deposits to the Defendant at KRW 180,00,00,000, KRW 650,000 and KRW 27,00.
(b) excludes the shares of the corporation;