logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 05. 30. 선고 2018두38048 판결
(심리불속행) 양도세 무신고자의 결정시 객관적 취득가액이 확인되지 않아 환산가액으로 과세한 처분은 정당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-33215 ( October 24, 2018)

Title

(C) If the objective acquisition value is not verified at the time of determination of a person who filed a report on transfer tax, a disposition imposed on the conversion value is legitimate.

Summary

(Main) The Plaintiff reported the transfer income tax without filing a report, and the materials presented as acquisition value are not accompanied by objective evidence, and other specific and objective supporting materials are not presented. In addition, the Plaintiff failed to present the detailed and objective supporting materials by which the acquisition value can be known, and the acquisition value is unclear, and disposition is determined as conversion value and disposition is legitimate.

Related statutes

Article 97 (Calculation of Necessary Expenses for Transfer Income)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow