beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 101,345,530 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 29, 2014 to May 27, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that deals with health insurance affairs for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of, and rehabilitation from, the disease and injury of citizens and for the improvement of health pursuant to the National Health Insurance Act. 2) The Defendant is a medical corporation that operates the Acheon-ro Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). A is a doctor who belongs to the Defendant Hospital and carries out cerebrovascular surgery against B.
B. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident 1) B was diagnosed by Teinson around 2002, and was administered by the Defendant Hospital from around 2004 with a Mavodopum ingredients, etc. The Defendant hospital received treatment from A on March 24, 2009, such as having been administered with a Mavodopum ingredients, etc.
(2) On April 8, 2009, upon considering the explanation about the instant surgery, following the instant surgery adaptation test on April 6, 2009, the instant surgery was determined to undergo the instant surgery from A for the treatment of Pakistan’s disease. (2) On April 8, 2009, the Defendant Hospital was subject to the blood test necessary for the instant veterinary surgery at the Defendant Hospital, i.e., the MFI test conducted at the time, and the MFI test conducted at the time showed a broad range of brain chill, etc.
3) B was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on May 20, 209 to undergo the instant surgery, and the Defendant Hospital from around May 21, 2009 to around 07:21, the Defendant Hospital was installed in the head of B from around May 21, 2009 in the two joints of the patient, each of which is two in the mast and back head, and the body of the patient is installed in a medical device until the patient’s head is excavated and the two in the mast and back head, and the head with the accelerator is laid in a frame (the frame and frost). The term “a fixed frame for this purpose” means a fixed frame for the purpose of carrying brain-I shooting of the patient’s head.
Around 08:18 and around 09:20 each of the following day after the date fixed to the Defendant Hospital. 4) The Defendant Hospital held brain MI photographs on the same day.