beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highly 1846] The Defendant driven a B Ors Vehicle, and on April 18, 2012, at around 0.063% of blood alcohol level, the Defendant driven the said vehicle owned by the Defendant from the front day of the death distance in the Gu tax office located in the city of Mappppon to the front day of the Flupon Building located in the same Dong Kim dong, to approximately 500 meters.
[2013 High Court 1847]
1. On September 30, 2010, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) on the paper of the pre-sale contract printed in the dwelling area of the Defendant located in the wife population C, the Defendant entered the name of the Defendant, “Acheon million won”, “Acheon million won” in the column of the pre-sale contract, “Acheon million won” in the remainder column, “Acheon million won” in the temporary column of the name of the real estate; (b) on November 15, 2007 in the temporary column of the name of the real estate; (c) entered “24 months” in the pre-sale period; and (d) affixed the lessor’s name, “A wife population in Gyeonggi-do and D”, and affixed the D seal that the Defendant left in advance.
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a set-off contract in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On September 30, 2010, the Defendant: (a) presented the forged pre-tax agreement to F at the G office of the F management of the Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu E and 236, as if it were a document duly formed; and (b) exercised the aforementioned pre-tax agreement.
3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing Paragraph 2, proposed one copy of the pre-tax agreement forged as above to the victim F, and had the victim enticed as if there was a pre-tax agreement in fact and could offer the deposit amount of KRW 15 million as security.
The Defendant acquired money from the victim, i.e., KRW 2.90,000 from the victim, and KRW 9 million from November 1, 2010 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (H) account in the name of the Defendant, respectively.
Summary of Evidence
[2013 High Court Decision 1846]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant 1.