1. Of the part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who falls under the following amount ordered to pay.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (1. 1.). Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The court's explanation on this part of the arguments by the parties is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (2. A. The parties' assertion). Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

나. 판 단 ⑴ 이 사건 임대차계약의 존속 여부에 대한 판단 ㈎ 이 사건 특약조항의 의미 보건대, 처분문서는 그 진정성립이 인정되면 특별한 사정이 없는 한 그 처분문서에 기재되어 있는 문언의 내용에 따라 당사자의 의사표시가 있었던 것으로 객관적으로 해석하여야 하고, 당사자 사이에 계약의 해석을 둘러싸고 이견이 있어 처분문서에 나타난 당사자의 의사해석이 문제되는 경우에는 문언의 내용, 그와 같은 약정이 이루어진 동기와 경위, 약정에 의하여 달성하려는 목적, 당사자의 진정한 의사 등을 종합적으로 고찰하여 논리와 경험칙에 따라 합리적으로 해석하여야 한다

(See Supreme Court Decision 9Da23574 delivered on February 27, 2001, Supreme Court Decision 2000Da5336, 5343 delivered on January 24, 2003, etc.). The following facts or circumstances that can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the entries and the overall purport of pleadings as to the instant case, and the following facts are stated as follows: ① The instant lease agreement is stipulated as the special terms and conditions, that read, “Lessee shall make the monthly rent and the management fee every three months overdue overdue, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s seal are affixed; ② the instant lease was concluded under the lead of the management office of commercial buildings where the instant store is located.”