The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Defendant

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel is that the punishment imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of various circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes in this case as well as his mistake in depth and seems to result in each of the crimes in this case.

Therefore, the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on July 23, 2010 due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dggravated Punishment, etc.) at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court on April 8, 2012) and committed each of the crimes of this case even though six months have not passed since the execution of the above punishment was completed on April 8, 2012. Considering the circumstances leading up to each of the crimes of this case and the criminal records of the defendant, it is determined that the defendant is highly likely to repeat a crime. The court below determined the punishment in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant. The court below determined the punishment in consideration of the above circumstances favorable to the defendant. Some damage to public goods (A. of this case) which the defendant was denied at the court below in the first instance trial, injury, theft, and all of the crimes, but it is difficult to view that there are special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, the defendant's motive and circumstances after the defendant's appeal, and the reasons for the defendant's appeal.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.