The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Defendant

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel is that the punishment (one year of imprisonment) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, it is true that the defendant has a good condition to consider the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and divided his mistake in depth, the fact that the Korea Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., the owner of the vehicle involved in this case, was a member of the victim D who died of the accident of this case under the name of damages, paid approximately KRW 75 million to the bereaved family members of the victim E who died of the accident of this case, approximately KRW 2.4 million to the victim E who suffered the injury, and the network unauthorized crossing seems to have caused the accident of this case, and the defendant has no other family member except the visually disabled person.

However, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s driving of a motor vehicle in a drinking state caused the instant accident and caused the death of D; (b) the Defendant did not properly recover damage to victims including D, and thus did not reach an agreement with the victims; (c) further, the Defendant committed the act of forging, uttering, forging, or uttering private documents in the police investigation process of a separate case; (d) the lower court determined the punishment in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (e) there were no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered newly after the pronouncement of the lower judgment; and (e) other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as specified in the argument and the record, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime; and (e) taking into account all the circumstances asserted by the Defendant as grounds for appeal, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable to the extent that the Defendant

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel are without merit.