The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (as regards each of the crimes listed in No. 2 to No. 17 in the table of crime committed at the time of sale: Imprisonment with prison labor for 2 months and for the remaining crimes: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, that the Defendant agreed with all victims, that in the case of frauds No. 1 and 3 of the judgment, and that in the case of frauds No. 2 of the judgment, there is a relationship between the crime of fraud for which the judgment has become final and the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 38 of the Criminal Act and the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 38 of the Criminal Act.

However, the crime of this case requires the defendant to carry out landscaping construction works of golf courses created in the above company by taking advantage of the status of the head of business department of D Co., Ltd.

The defendant's assertion is not accepted since the court below's punishment is too unfair in consideration of the fact that the defendant has escaped for a long time, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., were taken into account. It is not recognized that the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable, since it is not recognized that the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable in light of the following: the defendant's deception is obtained by deceiving the victims to find employment as an employee of the J High School established by the above company; the victim's deceptions by deceiving the victims in excess of KRW 50 million through the trust relationship with the victim H, using the trust relationship with the victim H who was in a chain of relationship.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.