Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning each of the crimes of No. 1 through No. 6 of the crime sight table of the judgment excluding the compensation order.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the sentencing of the court below (the sentencing of the court below No. 1 to No. 6 on a yearly list of crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance: Imprisonment with prison labor for two months; imprisonment for seven months; imprisonment with prison labor for six months; and imprisonment with prison labor for six months; 6 months) is too unreasonable.

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the crime No. 1 through No. 6 in the list of crimes and the part concerning the judgment of the court of second instance on the judgment of the court of first instance on the judgment of the court of first instance, each of the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment of the court of second instance on the defendant's ex officio, and the defendant filed an appeal on this issue. The court of first instance decided to hold a joint hearing on the defendant's two appeals. Each of the crimes in the judgment of the court of first instance, No. 1 through No. 6 in the list of crimes and the judgment of the court of second instance, among the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be sentenced to a single punishment pursuant to Article 38

3. Of the judgment of the court below of first instance, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of suspension of execution while harming the investigation from the date when the judgment of suspension of execution became final to the date when the crime of fraud of the same law became final to the date when the Defendant committed the crimes of this case was committed repeatedly, and the amount of damage exceeds 6 million won, and the damage was not recovered.

In light of such circumstances and other conditions of sentencing as the Defendant’s age and environment, it does not seem that the lower court’s punishment is heavy. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion on this part cannot be accepted.

4. In conclusion, the part of the judgment of the court below as to each of the crimes No. 1 through No. 6 of the crime list No. 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the compensation order, and the ground for reversal ex officio.