1. The Defendant’s 1,05,284,688 won and the above 5,00,000 won out of the above 1,05,284,688 won to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s relocation promotion of the Plaintiff’s place of business was conducted on June 9, 1998 with a construction waste interim disposal business license granted on the construction waste interim disposal business license, and the Plaintiff is a plot of land outside 896 and four lots of land (hereinafter “existing place of business”).

(2) When the area surrounding the instant existing place of business was developed as a factory site, civil engineering and construction business has been engaged in construction waste interim disposal business, civil engineering and construction business, etc., civil petition was generated due to noise, vibration, dust, etc. generated from the Plaintiff’s place of business, and the Plaintiff was promoting the relocation of the place of business to the land of 4,357 square meters in Ansan-si (hereinafter “the prospective site for relocation”).

3) From October 25, 201 to November 2, 2011, the Plaintiff purchased the instant relocation scheduled site under the condition that the Plaintiff could not obtain permission for the relocation of the site from B to November 2, 2011. On the same day, the Plaintiff purchased the instant relocation scheduled site, and on the same day, requested the Defendant for consultation on the relocation of the instant relocated site under the title “(i.e., the title”) to move the instant relocation scheduled site to the instant pre-existing site due to the civil petition filing with the Defendant. (b) The Defendant submitted a document to the effect that “the Defendant’s permission was submitted.” (i) On November 22, 2011, the Defendant submitted to the Plaintiff a reply following the relocation of the construction waste disposal business site to the effect that “the Plaintiff’s temporary building pursuant to the review on the relocation of the site before the Plaintiff’s construction site,” and it is difficult to take measures to notify the Defendant of the construction plan to the extent that it would cause harm to the Plaintiff’s building site prior to the construction site (hereinafter.).