logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.28 2018고단4951
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence against the defendant for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution on July 12, 2018 by imprisonment with prison labor for aiding and abetting fraud at the Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 12, 2018.

The Defendant has no special occupation, and it is difficult for the Defendant to obtain a loan due to the absence of its own property, and even if he was unable to obtain a loan under the name of the purchase price for the middle and high-class loan, the Defendant made a false document according to his name-free loan hub and the instructions of the borrower, and conspired to obtain a second and second loan in the name of the Defendant.

Around October 10, 2017, Defendant 1, along with the above loan broker, loans in a e-mail office in MPk, a medium-sized tea complex, located in 158, in Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, by means of repaying KRW 14 million at a annual interest rate of 20.9% between 48 months and 432,767 won per month during the loan period in accordance with the direction of the above loan broker.

“Around December 2017, 2017, the following: (a) an agreement on the second and second misleading debate is prepared; (b) deliver it to D employees affiliated with ampample-, ample-, and require D to submit the said agreement to the victim KB Capital; and (c) was indicted as “2018.” However, as it is a clerical error, it is corrected.

10. Around November 1, 199, the Defendant purchased a heavy vehicle as stated in the above agreement and believed that the Defendant would repay the loan principal money to the account in the name of the original bank in the name of the ample-, ample-, Inc., and exempted the Defendant from the obligation to pay the vehicle price, thereby acquiring pecuniary profits equivalent to that amount.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the defendant's name-free loan hub, deceiving the victim and obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 14 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1.The second and second agreement of debate, ..

arrow