Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are members of “F”, a group of individual service providers, who run a business in E, as the base of the location of “D” among individual service providers, who access to the customer with cargo and commit illegal acts by parking the Ban on call at the Incheon Airport Parking Lot.

1. Defendant A was in conflict with G, which is the boomer of “F” business operators, and independently committed a call bareboat business.

He received instructions from G to prevent two people from committing an act of invitation in D with the consequence that H had conducted a call-based business in I and in the vicinity of the above D, and it is evident that January 3, 2014, written in the indictment on January 3, 2015, as indicated in the indictment, is a clerical error on January 3, 2015.

At around 09:10, in the vicinity of the Jart of the above office building, the victim I, who had provided a guest, expressed that “I will do so in this context, and I would like to see that I would like to see, “I will do so,” and that I would like to see, in collusion with G, interfered with the victim’s call Ban business by force.

2. Defendant B

A. On January 1, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the Defendant committed the Defendant’s crime against the Victim K (hereinafter “Defendant”) with the victim K, who is a taxi engineer (e.g., South 53 years old), and that the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s taxi business by force, such as: (a) the Defendant expressed that the Defendant would be able to go to go to the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant expressed that “I would go to go to go to the Defendant; and (b) she would go to go to go to go to the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant took advantage of the influence of the Defendant

B. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the Defendant committed the Defendant’s crime against the victim M, at around 20:00, the victim M ( South, 66 years old) who is an external call-based engineer, and expressed the victim’s desire to read “I see this ring, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, and flick,” and thereby interfere with the Defendant’s call-based business by force, such as the Defendant’s desire to read “I flick, flick, flick, flick, and flick.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Legal statement of the witness M;

1. M. I, K, and M.