logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.10 2015가단5358952
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 58,361,653 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from December 14, 2013 to November 10, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant medical corporation B is a corporation that establishes and operates the D Hospital at the time of division (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant hospital” in total), and the Defendant C is the chest director and professor of the Defendant hospital.

B. From around two weeks prior to September 25, 2013, the Plaintiff applied symptoms to another hospital to the address of another hospital. As a result of the waste CT inspection conducted by the hospital, the Plaintiff was aware of the suspicion of the waste cancer.

C. On September 27, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including the Defendant C, decided whether to conduct an operation after the tissue examination with respect to the Plaintiff who was admitted to the Defendant Hospital for close inspection and treatment.

On October 6, 2013, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was subject to an institutional landscape test, waste cans, PET-CT test, etc. at the hospital.

E. On October 28, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including the Defendant C, performed oppy (PCN) with respect to the Plaintiff, the medical personnel confirmed as 2bb(PT2bN00) the right-hand waste (RL) and determined the surgery.

F. On December 9, 2012, the Plaintiff re-hospitalized the Defendant Hospital on December 9, 2012; was subject to brain RI inspection on December 10, 2012; and as a result, the 14m size of 14m size was observed and the possibility of brain ties was doubtful.

G. On December 13, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including the Defendant C, performed the fladying operation and the flag removal operation.

H. On June 13, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including the Defendant C, conducted a chest examination against the Plaintiff on June 13, 2014. According to its opinion, there was no pulmonary cancer. However, as the Plaintiff complained of symptoms with low damage, fluoral and fluoral symptoms on the part of the body, and fluoral and fluoral symptoms were generated, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including the Defendant C, conducted a consultation and treatment with the Plaintiff. On June 19, 2014, the medical personnel diagnosed fluoral and fluoral therapy was conducted as serious opinion or fluoral and vert disc as a result of the fluoral and fluoral

I. On October 20, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, including Defendant C, etc., could not see the Plaintiff’s hand and fry, etc.

arrow