logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.07.22 2014나9214
건물명도
Text

1.The part concerning claims in the judgment of the court of first instance regarding claims in the principal lawsuit shall be modified as follows:

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim).

Reasons

1. As to the principal claim

A. On June 2, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) purchased the instant apartment owned by the Plaintiff from July 2, 2011 to July 1, 2013; (b) received the deposit money; and (c) delivered the instant apartment after having discovered the market price of the instant apartment in April 2013, the Plaintiff requested C, a licensed real estate agent, who arranged the instant lease, to negotiate with the Defendant to renew the lease by increasing the deposit amount of KRW 320 million; and accordingly, (c) on April 26, 2013, C, a licensed real estate agent, a broker of the instant apartment, was able to enter into consultation with the Defendant regarding the instant apartment (30 million first and second instances); and (d) on May 3, 2013, the Plaintiff could not substantially increase the lease deposit amount of KRW 320,000,000,000,000 to KRW 30,000,000,000,000.

3. On May 5, 2013, the Plaintiff heard her fembles with Defendant C, and set up the instant apartment as the object of lease at the real estate brokerage office around the instant apartment. Of real estate, G, who was requested by the Plaintiff for rental brokerage, may visit the instant apartment to verify the inside of the instant apartment between May 2013 and the lower order, and divided into a femble her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers

arrow