The judgment of the court below (excluding the part of application for compensation order) shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

Defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Regarding the case of misunderstanding of facts in 2013 J. 791, the Defendant did not support the victim’s beer.

In relation to the case 2013 Go-Ma235, the defendant tried to pay off the cell phone of the victim, but he was the victim.

놨다

under this chapter.

After a dispute between the Defendant and C (2012 Go-Ma857) arises between the Defendant and C (2012 Go-Ma857) (the case), the Defendant was involved in getting off or pushing ahead of the victim in the process of stopping the victim by continuing to talk with C.

Since the defendant's act is reasonable in terms of social norms, illegality is excluded by Article 20 of the Criminal Code.

The judgment of the court below on each of the above parts is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 4 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 (1) 2013고단791호 부분 원심이 적법하게 채택조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는, 피고인이 재산 문제 때문에 자신을 찾아왔고, 자신은 피고인을 상대하지 않으려고 베개를 베고 누워 있었는데, 피고인이 발로 자신의 머리 왼쪽 부분을 찼다고 일관되게 진술한 점, ② 피고인이 원심에서 신청한 증인으로 피해자의 처이자 피고인의 모친인 L는, 피고인이 베개를 찼는지 피해자의 머리를 찼는지는 모르지만 무엇인가를 찼다고 진술하였는바, 위 진술은 피해자의 진술에 부합하여 신빙성이 있는 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인은 피해자가 베고 있는 베개를 발로 차 폭행한 사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있다.

The lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged.

(2) The following circumstances, i.e., the victim, based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, are revealed.