logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고단7335
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

A forged credit card, 24 copies (No. 1 through 24), forged identification card.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who was from Ruania and entered the Republic of Korea around September 3, 2014.

1. On September 5, 2014, the Defendant violated the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) purchased goods equivalent to KRW 1,000,000 from the new world department store located in Jung-gu in Seoul, Jung-gu; (b) presented a forged credit card on which information on a credit card (credit card number: C) issued in LTD was properly issued as if he were duly issued; and (c) obtained goods in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,00,000 after having an employee in the name of the above person pay the price with a forged credit card; (d) obtained the forged credit card; (e) obtained the forged credit card from September 4, 2014 to December 22, 2014; and (e) obtained the forged credit card from September 4, 2014 to obtain the forged credit card amounting to KRW 40,539,510 on a forged credit card amounting to KRW 40,510,510; and (e) acquired the forged credit card by fraud.

2. Around September 4, 2014, the Defendant attempted to purchase goods equivalent to KRW 3,00,000 from the above New World department stores, and to make payment by presenting a forged credit card (D) issued by a credit card (D) in Australia as if the information was actually issued, and attempted to make payment as if the credit card was actually issued, but the approval was refused and the intention was not achieved, as described in the attached Table of Crimes (2). However, the Defendant attempted to purchase goods equivalent to KRW 78,959,450 on a total amount from September 4, 2014 to September 22, 2014 by using a forged credit card from September 4, 2014 to September 78, 959,450 on a total amount from September 22, 2014, but failed to realize such intent and attempted to use the forged credit card.

3. Around August 2014, the Defendant’s display of the said investigation document is attached to the Defendant’s photograph (PRIER APE) F, which is accompanied by the Defendant’s photograph.

arrow