logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.01.30 2018고정398
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a social worker employed in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

On August 25, 2018, at around 16:30 on August 25, 2018, the Defendant stolen the victim F (25 years of age, n, n, n)’s surveillance inside the three-story E store of the building D in Gunsan-si, which was displayed in the store display stand by taking advantage of the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim F (25 years of age, n, n) was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (a statement that recognized that he/she engaged in the same conduct as the criminal facts, but it is deemed that the defendant and the defendant's wife have settled each other);

1. A written statement;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to attachment of photographs) (if the defendant brought a gymnizing out of a store to the children who are located in another store in order to view it, it is necessary to obtain permission from the employees of the store and bring it out to the outside of the store. If an employee does not know of the employee's permission, it is necessary to pay more attention to the settlement of gymnasium in order to ensure that the settlement of gymnasium has been properly made. Nevertheless, if the defendant stated that he did not hear the statement from the defendant's wife, it is doubtful whether the defendant clearly notified the wife that he would make the settlement. Considering this, it is questionable whether the defendant would have been aware of the possibility that it would not make a settlement of gymnasium, and thus, it can be recognized that there was an intention of larceny at least at least a gymnasium in the absence of such a settlement, and thus, it can be recognized that there was an intention of larceny).

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow