Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant,

1. On May 2010, 2010, Defendant C was thought to use money for the cost of living without using it for the construction expense even if she borrowed money. On May 2009, the Defendant was in a state of no particular income or property, and at the time of his/her default on payment, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he/she borrowed money from the victim. However, it is false that “A construction work is scheduled and if the necessary expenses are loaned money, he/she would receive the payment for the construction work.” Accordingly, Defendant 50,000 won on the same day from the victim.

2. On August 2010, the victim made a false statement to the effect that: (a) the facts were thought to use money for living expenses by lending money; and (b) there was no intent or ability to repay it; (c) however, (d) the victim would accept the payment of the construction cost if the expenses were to be incurred by the attorney in the course of running his/her business and the expenses were insufficient; and (e) the victim would receive the payment of the construction cost on the same day

3. On October 2010, 2010, the following false statements were made to the victim, who was killed in the first instance on the ground that the victim did not have the intent or ability to repay the same fact, but is urgently required to receive a demand for payment, and that the said money is 4.5 million won from the victim on the same day;

4. Around September 2013, the victim entered the foregoing victim, and the fact did not have any intent or ability to repay debts with no particular property at the time, but did not have any intent or ability to repay debts, the electricity or urban gas was cut down in the house, and the victim made a false statement that “I would pay for the completion of the construction works if the construction site in progress exceeds the construction site,” and that deceivings the victim with KRW 300,000 as the account of community credit cooperatives in the name of the defendant around October 25, 2013, and 8,30,000 won in total from each victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;