1. The amount of real estate stated in the separate sheet shall be put to an auction and the remainder after deducting the auction cost from the price shall be attached;

If the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 is added to the whole purport of the pleadings, there are circumstances that make it difficult to divide the real estate of this case in kind in the form of the form of the real estate in consideration of the following: (a) the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter the plaintiff); (b) the designated parties indicated in the separate sheet; and (c) the Defendants’ respective shares as indicated in the separate sheet; and (d) the fact that the agreement on the division of the real estate of this case has not been reached between the plaintiff and the Defendants; and (b) the location and size of the real estate of this case, the utilization status, the value of use after the division; (c) the co-owners’ relationship; (d) the status of co-owners; and (e)

In addition, Defendant E finally expresses his intention to want to divide the price by auction, and Defendant D expressed his intention to divide the co-owners who want to purchase and sell the instant real estate into co-owners. In conclusion, it is reasonable to resolve the co-ownership by way of distributing the remaining amount after deducting the cost of auction from the proceeds of auction from the proceeds of auction to the auction according to the share ratio of co-owners. It is so decided as per Disposition.